<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Google Search Results</title>
	<link>http://davesrants.com/2005/08/27/new-google-search-results</link>
	<description>Never Knowing when to shut up!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: David Callan</title>
		<link>http://davesrants.com/2005/08/27/new-google-search-results#comment-10046</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 20:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://davesrants.com/2005/08/27/new-google-search-results#comment-10046</guid>
					<description>From what I've heard this is to do with Google toolbar data, sites with lots of links get something triggered and then toolbar finds the most popular sections for these links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#8217;ve heard this is to do with Google toolbar data, sites with lots of links get something triggered and then toolbar finds the most popular sections for these links.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: beanbag</title>
		<link>http://davesrants.com/2005/08/27/new-google-search-results#comment-6512</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 20:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://davesrants.com/2005/08/27/new-google-search-results#comment-6512</guid>
					<description>Hi guys,

Did anyone actually work out what a site needs to have / to do to get these extra links in place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,</p>
<p>Did anyone actually work out what a site needs to have / to do to get these extra links in place?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tony Ruscoe</title>
		<link>http://davesrants.com/2005/08/27/new-google-search-results#comment-5179</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://davesrants.com/2005/08/27/new-google-search-results#comment-5179</guid>
					<description>Milan, the Google Sitemap for FreeTranslation.com was added after the additional links started to appear in Google's search results. (I know this for a fact because I put it there...)

In fact, a few days after the file was added, the additional links disappeared and then later changed to only display two links rather than four.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Milan, the Google Sitemap for FreeTranslation.com was added after the additional links started to appear in Google&#8217;s search results. (I know this for a fact because I put it there&#8230;)</p>
<p>In fact, a few days after the file was added, the additional links disappeared and then later changed to only display two links rather than four.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Milan</title>
		<link>http://davesrants.com/2005/08/27/new-google-search-results#comment-5145</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 12:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://davesrants.com/2005/08/27/new-google-search-results#comment-5145</guid>
					<description>Well, here you go...
http://www.freetranslation.com/sitemap.xml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, here you go&#8230;<br />
<a href='http://www.freetranslation.com/sitemap.xml' rel='nofollow'>http://www.freetranslation.com/sitemap.xml</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tony Ruscoe</title>
		<link>http://davesrants.com/2005/08/27/new-google-search-results#comment-5072</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://davesrants.com/2005/08/27/new-google-search-results#comment-5072</guid>
					<description>I don't think it's got anything to do with Google sitemaps.

Searching for &amp;#34;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=translation&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;translation&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#34; on Google returns those additional results for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freetranslation.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FreeTranslation.com&lt;/a&gt;, yet that site doesn’t have a Google Sitemap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s got anything to do with Google sitemaps.</p>
<p>Searching for &quot;<a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=translation" rel="nofollow">translation</a>&quot; on Google returns those additional results for <a href="http://www.freetranslation.com/" rel="nofollow">FreeTranslation.com</a>, yet that site doesn’t have a Google Sitemap.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt</title>
		<link>http://davesrants.com/2005/08/27/new-google-search-results#comment-5057</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 20:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://davesrants.com/2005/08/27/new-google-search-results#comment-5057</guid>
					<description>I imagine it does it for those sites which have &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.google.com/webmasters/sitemaps/docs/en/protocol.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;created a Google Sitemap&lt;/a&gt;. If you look at the URL on those special results, it points to a variable called &quot;smap.&quot; Handy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine it does it for those sites which have <a href="https://www.google.com/webmasters/sitemaps/docs/en/protocol.html" rel="nofollow">created a Google Sitemap</a>. If you look at the URL on those special results, it points to a variable called &#8220;smap.&#8221; Handy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
